If I remember correctly, one of the major questions raised in Umberto Eco's masterpiece, The Name of the Rose, was whether laughter was permissible in the Catholic Church or whether laughter was an instrument of the Devil.
We think we know that our Milky Way galaxy is estimated to have 100 to 400 billion stars, with estimates for the number of galaxies from 100 billion to 2 trillion in the "whatever is out there," which is expanding all the time into the endless "wherever."
Who needs another Pope, funny or not, limited to a world view of 2,000 plus years.
Isn't it time to retire Popes as Princes, Queens and Kings have mostly been retired?
If I remember correctly, one of the major questions raised in Umberto Eco's masterpiece, The Name of the Rose, was whether laughter was permissible in the Catholic Church or whether laughter was an instrument of the Devil.
Very funny jokes, thanks.
But, who needs any more Popes after 265?
Isn't enough, enough.
We think we know that our Milky Way galaxy is estimated to have 100 to 400 billion stars, with estimates for the number of galaxies from 100 billion to 2 trillion in the "whatever is out there," which is expanding all the time into the endless "wherever."
Who needs another Pope, funny or not, limited to a world view of 2,000 plus years.
Isn't it time to retire Popes as Princes, Queens and Kings have mostly been retired?
Should Pope Francis be the last?