Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan Rottenberg's avatar

From reader Rob Hollister:

Love your takedown of David Brooks. Also enjoyed just now reading your spoof "On the road with David Brooks."

Vol. 161 resonates because I've always been bothered by Brooks's smug and isolated pontificating. Over the past year, I've come to like him better as he has become more candid about how much he is horrified by Trump & Co.'s assault on democracy. On occasions, in his TV appearances, he comes across as more of a human being. And on other occasions, he continues to be clueless.

For me, a recent example was his advocacy that folks move beyond their preoccupation with Epstein. The Epstein story is, of course, a sordid mess and a lot of the popular attention is prurient. But Brooks is oblivious to the life realities of Epstein's victims and to the broader story of women who've been abused, and he doesn't see the story of elites who ignore rules and norms, skating through life irresponsibly.

What a radical notion you have, that journalists should actually get out there and talk to and with people.

Here's a total fantasy: David Brooks finds a next perch at Sinclair Community College in Dayton, Ohio.

Dan Rottenberg's avatar

From reader Cirel Magen:

You are kind about David Brooks’ psychobabble. I watch with horror, as the NYT becomes less and less of a newspaper; and more and more of a publisher of little stories loosely related to current events, filled with photographs having nothing to do with the articles they supposedly illustrate, and the latest pop-words, like "cheeky" and "existential.".

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?